Home About Project Action Tobacco Free Outdoors Tobacco Advertising Events Newsletters Links

News & Press

 
Posted
6
JAN
2012
 

Reduce Density of Tobacco Retail Outlets

Reduce density of tobacco retail outlets

January 6, 2012
The Leader Herald

Did you know that the simple act of walking to school or even to a friend's house could be dangerous to your child's health? Big tobacco has its eye on new cigarette-buying customers: our children. The Federal Trade Commission reports that each year, big tobacco spends $12.8 billion in the United States, more than $35 million a day, to market their deadly and addictive products. After all, they need to replace the 400,000 U.S. smokers who die each year with new replacement customers.

New York has done a good job shielding our children from big tobacco. While most states have seen a slowing of the decline of youth smoking, New York's rates have continued to decline steadily. Since 1997, smoking among New York high school students decreased 58 percent from 32.9 percent in 1997 to 13.8 percent in 2007.

However, according to Project Action Tobacco-Free Coalition, in New York, there is one licensed tobacco retailer for every 194 children under age 18. Do we really need all of these outlets to sell tobacco products? Tobacco-outlet density is significantly associated with youth smoking and illegal youth cigarette purchases. Studies show that reducing retail tobacco outlet density is likely to reduce rates of youth smoking and sales to minors.

Tobacco products should only be used and purchased by adults. We don't need tobacco being sold across the street from our schools or in the local corner store that our kids frequent. We need to take a stand to help protect the health and well-being of our youth and make that a priority.

The Gloversville-Johnstown Kiwanis Club has two mottos, "We Build" and "Serving the Children of the World." We feel it is most important to control the accessibility of tobacco in our community and wish to thank Project ACTION for its advocacy for our youth.

BONNIE S. PECK

President,

Gloversville-Johnstown Kiwanis Club


     
Posted
5
JAN
2012
 

Watch out for dangerous tobacco ads

Watch out for dangerous tobacco ads

January 5, 2012
The Leader Herald

According to the United States National Cancer Institute, mass media has the power to both encourage tobacco use, especially among young people, and to discourage it. Findings have shown that mass media can change youth attitudes toward tobacco use. Since cigarettes are one of the highest- marketed products in the United States, the tobacco industry has its scheme to lure smokers with three basic themes - tobacco provides satisfaction, dangers of tobacco shouldn't provoke anxiety and tobacco is associated with desirable outcomes such as social success.

However, media campaigns that are depicted to reduce tobacco use also do work, allowing youth to change attitudes about tobacco, with an effort to reduce the chances that children will start smoking.

With that said, pay attention to what you see behind the counter the next time you stop into a store to pay for your items. Educate the youth in your lives about the dangers of tobacco use. You may change their attitude and save another youngster from picking up a cigarette.

For more information on smoking cessation, contact Project ACTION at www.projectactionhfm.org or call 841-7123 or 841-7288.

CHRISTINA D. AKEY

Fulton County Public Health educator and Project ACTION member


     
Posted
21
NOV
2011
 

OUR NEW VIDEO HAS BEEN POSTED TO YOUTUBE! CHECK IT OUT!!!

 http://youtu.be/eu1K7qzoDi0


     
Posted
3
OCT
2011
 

Getting People to Kick the Habit Pays a lot more than Tobacco Taxes - and Quickly

by Katherine Harmon, September 29, 2011

In 2009 California took in $839 million in taxes from the sale of cigarettes. And with its—and many other states’—budget in dire straights, it is hard to turn down any extra income.

But that’s just what the state has been doing, with overall cigarette sales dropping year after year thanks to anti-smoking efforts. And these tobacco control programs aren’t free either—adding up to some $100 million per year for California alone.

So why take such a hit, with the state more than $374 billion in the hole? The payoff in medical savings more than makes up for money lost—and fast, according to a new essay published online Wednesday in The Lancet.

Tobacco use, as we well know, can lead to long, slow and expensive chronic conditions, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease and respiratory problems. So getting people to stop smoking now had been expected to pay off in avoided medical costs down the road. Such long-term benefits, though, can be a tough sell in the world of short-term, election-cycle politics.

The payoffs of getting people to kick their cigarette habit are actually quite immediate, argue the essay’s authors, Stanton Glantz and Mariaelena Gonzalez, both of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at University of California, San Francisco. In the past decade evidence has been mounting to show that “benefits of reducing smoking accrue quickly; a reduction in tobacco use rapidly decreases [non-communicable diseases] and health-care costs within one year,” they wrote.

As soon as a person stops smoking, his or her risk of a heart attack drops, and it continues to fall for five years, when it reaches levels close to those of people who have not smoked. With the number of smokers in that state having declined some 50 percent since 1985, that is presumably a lot of heart attacks—and related medical bills—avoided. But just how much?

Here’s how the numbers break down: In the first 15 years of the California tobacco control program, the state spent $1.4 billion on the initiative, during which time it also lost some $3.1 billion on tax revenue from all of the billions of packs its residents were no longer buying. Could all of that lost money possibly be made up in avoided health care expenses? Yes, more than 19 times over. With the reduction in smokers over that same 15-year period, some $86 billion in direct medical costs were avoided, Glantz and Gonzalez noted. And that does not include the extra money flowing into the economy generated by increased productivity—thanks to more, and higher quality, days of work—of the non-smokers. A similar story has played out in Arizona, where like tobacco control measures were introduced.

After last week’s U.N. General Assembly’s special session on non-communicable diseases, to which tobacco use is a major contributor worldwide, the organization recommended that “member states implement six tobacco control policies based on the [World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control] (strong clean indoor air laws, increased price, banning of advertising and promotion, education and prevention, cessation services, and monitoring or tobacco use and prevention policies),” Glantz and Gonzalez wrote. “However, as of 2009, less than 10 percent of the world’s population was covered” by these guidelines.

Despite the challenge of putting these recommendations into practice—and the continued opposition of the tobacco industry—the researchers noted, there is good reason to forge ahead, even from a purely economic standpoint. Policy makers and the public “can be confident that there is good evidence showing that effective programs not only reduce tobacco use and the attendant [non-communicable diseases] in the short term, but [also] make an important contribution to curbing health care costs and improving standards of living and human capital levels immediately, with increasing benefits over time.”

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2011/09/29/getting-people-to-kick-the-cigarette-habit-pays-much-more-than-tobacco-taxes-and-quickly/


     
Next


Project Action provides free signs to businesses and organizations that adopt tobacco free policies
  Find Out More